LinkedIn ghostwriting for executives
September 15, 2026 · Bradley Jacobs
Get your free LinkedIn positioning in 60 seconds — drop your handle:
LinkedIn ghostwriting for executives is not hiring someone to invent a polished corporate voice for you. It works when the writing is first-person, pulled from expertise you already have, locked to clear positioning, and shipped at least three times a week on your personal profile. If the draft could have been written about any exec in your industry, it is not ghostwriting. It is AI slop with your name on it.
I say this as someone who has posted on LinkedIn every day for six years, run workshops for founders and fractionals, and built Mylance as a LinkedIn content system for people who already have a real business. Below is how I think about ghostwriting for executives, what to pay for, what to reject, and what actually moves profile views.
Mylance is a LinkedIn content system that turns your real expertise into consistent LinkedIn content that sounds like you.
What LinkedIn ghostwriting for executives should mean
It should mean someone (or a system) who already understands your ideal customer, your pain points, and what differentiates you, then drafts posts in your first-person point of view from material you already have.
On a call about LinkedIn for executive teams, I said it plainly: a lot of executives are not going to spend the time to do this themselves. They want it off their plate. That is fine. What is not fine is handing the work to a writer who never interviews you, never reads your essays or podcast transcripts, and then produces generic thought leadership that sounds like every other feed.
Great content starts with great positioning. I said that on the Impromptu Zoom workshop, and I still mean it. Ghostwriting without positioning is just volume.
Why most executive LinkedIn ghostwriting fails
It fails because the output sounds like AI, or like a press release, even when a human wrote it.
On Maven LIVE I asked people what words come to mind when they think about posting on LinkedIn. They said AI slop. Cringe. Inauthentic. Ego. Then I showed a post about Uber and Lyft launching Raleigh on the same day. I was on that launch team. The post got about 700,000 impressions and 22 inbound conversations. Nowhere in it did I say hire me. It was a first-person story with specifics only I could tell.
That is the test for executive ghostwriting. If the draft could not pass the "does this feel like AI slop" check, scrap it. On a Gregory Kohs call I said the balance is always the same: I want you to do as little work as possible, and I still refuse to contribute to the AI slop on LinkedIn.
How much LinkedIn ghostwriting for executives usually costs
Most serious LinkedIn ghostwriting retainers land between about $1,000 and $5,000 a month, with cheaper options around $500 and full-service premium work climbing higher.
On calls I talk about our done-for-you option around a thousand bucks a month. Warren Sukernek heard $999. Gregory heard a thousand. The number is less important than what you are buying: a forcing function to show up three times a week, drafts that start from your real material, and edits that make the next draft sound more like you.
If someone quotes you five figures and still needs you to invent every idea from scratch, you are paying for a secretary, not a system.
What executives should feed a ghostwriter (or a content system)
Feed it source material you already have, not blank prompts.
On the Ognen LinkedIn Expertise Chat I described the workflow: interview you for 20 or 30 minutes, or take anything you have already written or said, then draft about three posts a week in your voice. On the executive-team call I said the same thing another way. If the executive has essays, podcasts, or transcripts, plug those in. That is how you get wording, phrasing, and experience instead of generic industry commentary.
With Matthew Accomando I put it bluntly: the posts are not generic AI stuff. They pull on what you have said. If positioning is not nailed, the prompts will be off. Fix positioning first.
Cadence executives actually need
Minimum three times a week on the personal profile. Monday, Wednesday, Friday works.
I post daily. Most busy operators will not. On Joe's call we set the standard at three times a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday. On Alteryx I said I schedule the week in about 15 minutes. On Paul Cappellucci's call I called consistency a forcing function: you are going to show up three times a week.
Your followers are not seeing every post. Three published posts in a calendar week is how you get seen once without turning LinkedIn into another job.
What to measure if you are an executive using a ghostwriter
Measure profile views over 90 days, not vanity likes on a single post.
In the workshop I showed 3,166 profile views across 90 days. That is the number I care about. People already on LinkedIn find you through the content, then they look at the profile. Company-page vanity metrics are not the center of the strategy. People want to hear from people.
Ghostwriter vs LinkedIn content system
A traditional ghostwriter writes for you. A LinkedIn content system remembers your positioning, starts from your real source material, drafts in your voice, and gets sharper when you edit.
That is the product I built after years of posting myself. On Warren's call I said content is only as good as your positioning, and most writers leave positioning to you. On Alteryx I said AI is only so good. You still edit. Done beats perfect. The forcing function matters more than a perfect first draft.
FAQ
Do executives need a LinkedIn ghostwriter?
Only if the alternative is silence. If you already have essays, talks, podcasts, or call notes, you need a system that turns that into first-person posts three times a week, not a writer inventing a persona.
Should executives post from the company page or personal profile?
Personal profile first. I put the vast majority of my energy there. The company page gets reposts. Nobody cares about the company page the way they care about a person.
How often should an executive post if they use a ghostwriter?
At least three times a week. That is the floor I teach. Daily is what I do. Once a week usually fails because your network barely sees it.
What should an executive never outsource?
Your positioning and the final "does this sound like me" pass. If you will not spend five minutes killing AI tells, do not publish.
If you are an executive who already knows what you do and who you help, LinkedIn ghostwriting is only useful when it turns that expertise into consistent posts that sound like you. Anything else is just more noise.